FPA-PMLA-1403/CHN/2016 of Shri P. Gowsika Boopati v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Case brief
What is this about?
Shri P. Gowsika Boopati V/s The Joint…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3335/CHN/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3336/CHN/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-3337/CHN/2017 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1719/CHN/2017
G. Amudha … Appellant MP-PMLA-2633/CHN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1403/CHN/2016 Shri P. Gowsika Boopati … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Naveen Malhotra, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate for Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 04.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-1719/CHN/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1403/CHN/2016
Counsel for the appellant states that rejoinder could not be filed as the copy of the reply was not served. Mr. Vikas Garg appears on behalf of Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate states that the copy will be served to the counsel for the appellant within one week. Extra copy of the reply available on record is handedover to the counsel for the appellant who seeks time to file the rejoinder.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G. Amudha
- respondent
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
- appellant
Shri P. Gowsika Boopati
- other
Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court