FPA-PMLA-1296/AHD/2016 of Shri Chirag H. Parikh v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahemdabad
Case brief
What is this about?
Shri Chirag H. Parikh V/s The Joint Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| FPA-PMLA-1296/AHD/2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Shri Chirag H. Parikh | … | Appellant |
| FPA/PMLA/1297/AHD/2016 | ||
| Shri Dharmendrasinh V. Chauhan @ | ||
| Dharmin Chauhan | … | Appellant |
| FPA/PMLA/1298/AHD/2016 | ||
| Shreeji Developers | … | Appellant |
| FPA/PMLA/1300/AHD/2016 | ||
| Kiran Jayantilal Mala | … | Appellant |
| FPA/PMLA/1301/AHD/2016 | ||
| Shri Girish Purushottam | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2574/AHD/2016 COD | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1313/AHD/2016 | ||
| Aman Sachdeva | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1263/AHD/2016 | ||
| Ritesh Bansal | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2456/AHD/2016 MICS | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1180/AHD/2016 | ||
| Ankush Bansal | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2491/AHD/2016 U/S 35 | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1178/AHD/2016 | ||
| Girish Parshottam Patel | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2492/AHD/2016 U/S 35 | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1175/AHD/2016 | ||
| Jagruti Harshadkumar Mala | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-2493/AHD/2016 U/S | ||
| FPA-PMLA-1179/AHD/2016 |
||
| Dharmendrasinh V. Chauhan | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1176/AHD/2016 | ||
| Chirag Parikh | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1177/AHD/2016 | ||
| Tushar Bansal | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1269/AHD/2016 | ||
| Patel Girishbhai Parshottam Bhai Huf | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1270/AHD/2016 | ||
| Kusumben Jayantilal Mala | … | Appellant |
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shri Chirag H. Parikh
- appellant
Shri Dharmendrasinh V. Chauhan
- appellant
Shreeji Developers
- respondent
The Joint Director
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court