This order pertains to an appeal under the Money Laundering Act. The appellant did not file a rejoinder, and the matter was listed for final disposal on 21 March 2017. The instant order does not dispose of the merits of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1296/AHD/2016
Shri Chirag H. Parikh … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Parmatma Singh, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 16.12.2016
FPA-PMLA-1296/AHD/2016
Reply to the appeal has been filed by the learned counsel for the respondent. The copy of the reply has been served to the counsel for the appellant who states that the appellant does not want to file the rejoinder and the matter be listed for final disposal. It is submitted that the connected matters are coming up on 21st March, 2017. Accordingly, list the matter on 21st March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 16th December, 2016 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1296/AHD/2016
Page 1 of 1
Chirag H. Parikh
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
