FPA-PMLA-1275/IDR/2016 of Vijay Choudhary v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Indore
Case brief
What is this about?
Vijay Choudhary V/s The Joint Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-2362/IDR/2016 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1197/IDR/2016 |
|
|---|---|
| Vijay Choudhary … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-2524/IDR/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1276/IDR/2016 |
|
| Zoom Reality Projects Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-2364/IDR/2016 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1198/IDR/2016 |
|
| M/s Zoom Developers Pvt. Ltd … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-2525/IDR/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1277/IDR/2016 |
|
| M/s Zoom Developers Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 5. MP-PMLA-2526/IDR/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1280/IDR/2016 |
|
| M/s Bolster Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd. | |
| 6. MP-PMLA-2523/IDR/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1275/IDR/2016 |
|
| Vijay Choudhary … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Indore … Res |
pondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appea |
red |
| For the appellant : Mr. Rishi Sh. Param Sh. Harsh |
Sehgal, Advocate Saini, Advocate it Sethi, Advocate |
| For the respondent : M. Vikas G |
arg, Advocate |
FPA-PMLA-1197, ,1276,1198,1277,1280,1275/IDR/2016
Page 1 of 2
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vijay Choudhary
- appellant
Zoom Development Pvt. Ltd.
- appellant
M/s Zoom Developers Pvt. Ltd.
- appellant
M/s Bolster Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd.
- respondent
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Indore
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · March
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1275/IDR/2016
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court