FPA-PMLA-1275/IDR/2016 of Vijay Choudhary v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Indore & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Vijay Choudhary V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-2362/IDR/2016 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1197/IDR/2016 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Zoom Developers Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-2364/IDR/2016 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1198/IDR/2016 |
||
| Zoom Reality Developers Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 3. MP-PMLA-2523/IDR/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1275/IDR/2016 |
||
| Vijay Choudhary | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 4. MP-PMLA-2524/IDR/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1276/IDR/2016 |
||
| Vijay Choudhary | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 5. MP-PMLA-2525/IDR/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1277/IDR/2016 |
||
| M/s. Zoom Developers Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| & | ||
| 6. MP-PMLA-2526/IDR/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1280/IDR/2016 |
||
| M/s. Bolster Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Indore & Ors. | … | Respondents |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Raja Paramdeep Saini, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 17.05.2018
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Zoom Developers Pvt. Ltd.
- appellant
Zoom Reality Developers Pvt. Ltd.
- appellant
Vijay Choudhary
- appellant
M/s. Zoom Developers Pvt. Ltd.
- appellant
M/s. Bolster Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd.
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · May
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1275/IDR/2016
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court