Appeals against summoning order under PMLA were listed. Respondent sought time to file reply due to late receipt of synopsis. Matter listed for next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERIN ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-2435/CHN/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1200/CHN/2016 |
||
|---|---|---|
| T.D. Naidu | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1199/CHN/2016 | ||
| T.D.Naidu |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1264/CHN/2016 | ||
| Union Bank of India | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1265/CHN/2016 | ||
| Union Bank of India | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1201/CHN/2016 | ||
| Andhra Bank & Another | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-1202/CHN/2016 | ||
| Andhra Bank & Another | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. C.B. Gururaj, Advocate
For the respondent : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 22.11.2018
FPA-PMLA-1200, 1199, 1264, 1265, 1201 & 1202/CHN/2016
Appellant has filed the written synopsis. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that copy of the written synopsis has been received by the respondent today only. Therefore, respondent seeks time to file the additional written synopsis.
FPA-PMLA-1200, 1199, 1264, 1265, 1201 & 1202/CHN/2016
Page 1 of 2
Let the same be filed by the next date.
List on 27th February, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member New Delhi, 22nd November, 2018
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1200, 1199, 1264, 1265, 1201 & 1202/CHN/2016
Page 2 of 2
T.D. Naidu
Union Bank of India
Andhra Bank & Another
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
