Appellants seek time to satisfy the Tribunal regarding nexus and link of the appellants with funds, noting absence of pending scheduled offence complaint under PMLA.
Adjourned to 03.07.2018 for further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-PMLA-1173/AHD/2016 | |
|---|---|
| Rahul Gangwal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 2. FPA-PMLA-1174/AHD/2016 | |
| Vineet Gangwal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 3. FPA-PMLA-1266/AHD/2016 | |
| Rahul Gangwal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| & | |
| 4. FPA-PMLA-1267/AHD/2016 | |
| Vineet Gangwal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad … |
Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : Mr. Arun Goyal, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondents | : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 03.04.2018
FPA-PMLA-1173-1174/AHD/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1266-1267/AHD/2016
Learned counsel for the appellant states that there is no involvement of the appellant in the matter either directly or indirectly. He also states that no nexus and link has been established by the respondent to prove its case against the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent admits that no complaint, no scheduled offence complaint under PMLA is pending against the appellants. He seeks
& FPA-PMLA-1266-1267/AHD/2016
FPA-PMLA-1173-1174/AHD/2016
Page 1 of 2
sometime to satisfy this Tribunal a link and nexus, if any, of the appellant by the next date.
List on 03rd July, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 03rd April, 2018
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1173-1174/AHD/2016
& FPA-PMLA-1266-1267/AHD/2016
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the appellants time to establish nexus and link with the funds
Whether the Tribunal should decide the appeal without pending scheduled offence complaint
Rahul Gangwal
Vineet Gangwal
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
