The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Palo as a default because the appellant has not appeared since 12.05.2017 despite filing a reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-96/DLI/2017
Palo … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 11.07.2018
FPA-ND-96/DLI/2017
Reply has been filed. It appears from the record that nobody
appears on behalf of the appellant since 12.05.2017. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as default.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 11th July, 2018 ‘d’
FPA-ND-96/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Palo
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
