Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act forfeiture appeal listed for further proceedings after notice to appeal served.
Notice issued; respondent to file reply within stipulated timelines, with rejoinder permitted thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-96/DLI/2017
Palo … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None appearance For the respondent : Mr. D.S. Bhisht, J.C. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER
12.05.2017
FPA-ND-96/DLI/2017
Fresh appeal has been filed under section 68(O) of NDPS challenging the order dated 23rd March, 2016. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. D.S. Bhisht accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. He submits that the copy of the appeal has not been served. The appellant is directed to serve the copy within one week and thereafter the counsel for the respondent may file the reply within one week. Rejoinder may be filed four weeks thereafter.
List on 6th October, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 12th May, 2017 ‘K’
FPA-ND-96/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Palo
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
