The Appellate Tribunal allowed an application for adjournment in this narcotics matter on the grounds that the case was pending in the Hon'ble Supreme Court, with no further substantive order recorded in this text.
Adjournment of the matter granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR NARCOTIC DRUGS & PSYCOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, NEW DELHI
FPA-ND-21/BOM/2014
Nitin K. Bhanushali … Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Sh. Gaurav Chaudhary, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Sh. Ratnessh Srivastwa, I.O |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 27.11.2018
FPA-ND-21/BOM/2014
An application for adjournment has been filed on behalf of the appellant. Counsel for the appellant states that the matter has been pending in the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Re-notify on 28th March, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 27th November, 2018
‘K’
FPA-21/BOM/2014
Page 1 of 1
Nitin K. Bhanushali
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
