Listed case regarding maintainability of appeal before Enforcement Appeal Tribunal. Appellant absent; counsel sought adjournment. No substantive decision recorded.
During listing of FPA-FE-6/7/2014, respondent counsel argued appeal was not maintainable as it should have been filed before Special Director. Appellant was absent and counsel sought adjournment. No disposal or substantive order is recorded in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT
AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-6/MUM/2014 M/s. Jainex Foods (P) Ltd. … Appellant FPA-FE-7/MUM/2014 Sh. Ajay C. Modi … Appellant
Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None. For the respondent : Shri Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 16.02.2018
FPA-FE-6-7/MUM/2014
The counsel for the respondent submits that the appeal filed by the appellant is not maintainable as it ought to have been filed before the special director. The counsel for the appellant is not available. An adjournment is sought on behalf of the appellant.
List on 5th July, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi,
16th February, 2018.
‘K’
FPA-FE-6-7/MUM/2014
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Jainex Foods (P) Ltd.
Sh. Ajay C. Modi
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
