The tribunal adjourned the hearing to allow the appellants time to address submissions regarding objections raised by the respondent in appeal files FPA-FE-6/MUM/2014 and FPA-FE-7/MUM/2014.
Time granted to appellants to address submissions pending objections from respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-6/MUM/2014 M/s. Jainex Food Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant & FPA-FE-7/MUM/2014 Shri Ajay C. Mody … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Ms. Shohini Bhattacharya, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 05.07.2018
FPA-FE-6/MUM/2014 & FPA-FE-7/MUM/2014
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to address the submission in view of objections raised by the respondent.
Re-notify on 19.09.2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 05th July, 2018 ‘SKB’
FPA-FE-6/MUM/2014 & FPA-FE-7/MUM/2014
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Jainex Food Pvt. Ltd.
Shri Ajay C. Mody
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
