Two appeals filed against the Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement were dismissed in default as the appellants failed to appear and showed no interest in pursuing the matter.
Both appeals dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
(1) FPA-FE-942/DLI/2004
| Shri Ratender Pal Singh Bhatia | … Appellant |
|---|---|
| Versus | |
| The Special Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi | … Respondent |
| (2) FPA-FE-943/DLI/2004 | |
| Shri Pankaj Soni | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi |
… Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Pankaj Yadav, Legal Consultant |
| CORAM | |
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : MEMBER |
ORDER
15.11.2018
FPA-FE-942 & 943/DLI/2004
No one appears for the appellant. They have not been appearing consistently on the last many occasions when the case is listed for hearing. It appears that they are not interested for pursuing the appeals.
Both the appeals are dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
(Ananya Ray) Member New Delhi, 15th November, 2018. ‘D’
FPA-FE-942 & 943/DLI/2004
Page 1 of 1
Ratender Pal Singh Bhatia
Pankaj Soni
The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
