A single judge order of list/notice issued in 14 consolidated appeals. The appellants were absent; notice to appear was issued. No substantive ratio or decision was rendered.
Court notice issued to appellants and counsel to appear on the next date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-FE-57/MUM/2009 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Shri Kamlesh T. Parkekh | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| 2. FPA-FE-63/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri Mahendera Sanklecha | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| 3. FPA-FE-64/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri Sanjay Kataki | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 4. FPA-FE-71/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri S. Kasturi Ranagn | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 5. FPA-FE-72/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri Jacob John | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 6. FPA-FE-73/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri Ramesh S. Nahar | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 7. FPA-FE-80/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri Dinesh Singh | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| FPA-FE-57, 63, 64, 71-73, 80, 157, |
||
| 173, 226, 248, 252, 253/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-71/MUM/2010 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| 8. FPA-FE-157/MUM/2009 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Shri Nilesh Trivedi | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 9. FPA-FE-173/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri Paresh H. Parikh | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 10. FPA-FE-226/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri S. N. Kumbhare | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 11. FPA-FE-248/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri Anirudha Pandurang Koli | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 12. FPA-FE-252/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri Vinod Kumar Jagjivandas Shah | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| 13. FPA-FE-253/MUM/2009 | ||
| Shri Jai Singh Khimji Nagandhi | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
| & | ||
| 14. FPA-FE-71/MUM/2010 | ||
| Shri Satish Gajannan Mohile | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
FPA-FE-57, 63, 64, 71-73, 80, 157, 173, 226, 248, 252, 253/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-71/MUM/2010
Page 2 of 3
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 20.08.2018
FPA-FE-57, 63, 64, 71-73, 80, 157, 173, 226, 248, 252, 253/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-71/MUM/2010
No one appears on behalf of the appellants. Court notice be issued to the said parties as well as their counsels to appear before this Tribunal on the next date of hearing.
List on 21st January, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 20th August, 2018
‘AS’
FPA-FE-57, 63, 64, 71-73, 80, 157, 173, 226, 248, 252, 253/MUM/2009 & FPA-FE-71/MUM/2010
Page 3 of 3
Shri Kamlesh T. Parkekh; Shri Mahendera Sanklecha; Shri Sanjay Kataki; Shri S. Kasturi Ranagn; Shri Jacob John; Shri Ramesh S. Nahar; Shri Dinesh Singh; Shri Ni
The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
