FPA-FE-57/MUM/2009 of Sh. Kamlesh T. Parkekh v/s The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
ATFPFPA-FE-57/MUM/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Sh. Kamlesh T. Parkekh V/s The Special…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| FPA-FE-62/MUM/2009 | |
|---|---|
| Ms. Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-56/MUM/2009 | |
| Sh. Deepak Gopal Melwani | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-57/MUM/2009 | |
| Sh. Kamlesh T. Parkekh | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-63/MUM/2009 | |
| Sh Mahendera Sanklecha | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-64/MUM/2009 | |
| Sh. Sanjay Kataki | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-69/MUM/2009 | |
| Sh. Kishoire S. Nahar | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-71/MUM/2009 | |
| Sh. S. Kasturi Ranagn FPA-FE-73/MUM/2009 |
… Appellant |
| Sh. Ramesh S. Nahar | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-80/MUM/2009 | |
| Sh. Dinesh Singh | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-157/MUM/2009 | |
| Sh. Nilesh Trivedi | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-173/MUM/2009 | |
| Sh. Paresh H. Parikh FPA-FE-226/MUM/2009 |
… Appellant |
| Sh. S.N. Kumbhare FPA-FE-248/MUM/2009 |
… Appellant |
| Sh. Anirudha Pandurang FPA-FE-252/MUM/2009 |
… Appellant |
| Sh. Vinod Kumar Jagjivandas Shah | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-253/MUM/2009 | |
| Sh. Jai Sinh Khimji Nagandhi | … Appellant |
| FPA-FE-71/MUM/2010 | |
| Sh. Satish Ganjannan Mohile | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Special Director | |
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … |
Respondent |
¶3
FPA-FE-59 - 61/MUM/2009
¶4
Page 1 of 2
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur
- appellant
Deepak Gopal Melwani
- appellant
Kamlesh T. Parkekh
- appellant
Mahendera Sanklecha
- appellant
Sanjay Kataki
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court