The Appellate Tribunal listed foreign exchange cases for adjudication but adjourned the hearing due to the unavailability of the appellant's proxy counsel.
The Tribunal listed the appeal for adjudication. An application for adjournment was made due to the unavailability of the proxy counsel for the appellant, resulting in the matter being adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-36/MUM/2000 Shri Bharat Hansraj Thakkar … Appellant FPA-FE-37/MUM/2000 Mrs. Yasmin M.V. Valibhoy … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Sanjiv Kakra, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Prashant Kumar Pandey, Legal Consultant & Ms. Aagam Kaur, Legal Consultant CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 19.02.2018
FPA-FE-36 & 37/MUM/2000
Mr. Sanjiv Kakra, Proxy counsel appears on behalf of the appellant
and submits that Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advocate who will argue the matter is busy and sought an adjournment.
List on 17th July, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 19th February, 2018. ‘s’ FPA-FE-36 & 37/MUM/2000
Page 1 of 1
Bharat Hansraj Thakkar
Yasmin M.V. Valibhoy
Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
