Appellants against the Special Director Directorate of Enforcement sought to contest a penalty order. The Tribunal noted the respondent's review petition was unlisted. The orders were adjourned for listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-155/MUM/2009 Sh. Ravi Goenka … Appellant FPA-FE-156/MUM/2009 Sh. Vasudev Goenka … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Avinash Suri, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms. Aagam Kaur, Legal Consultant Mr. Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant For the Respondent-5 : Sh. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 17.04.2018
FPA-FE-155-156/MUM/2009
It has been informed by the counsel for the respondent that respondent has also filed the review petition challenging the impugned order. According to the respondent, less amount of penalty has been imposed by the Adjudicating Authority. The review petition No. 88/2010 is not listed today. Registry will trace out the file and see that the same be listed along with above mentioned appeals filed by the appellant.
List on 27th August, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member New Delhi, 17th April, 2018.
‘K’
FPA-FE-155-156/MUM/2009
Page 1 of 1
Sh. Ravi Goenka
Sh. Vasudev Goenka
The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
