Appellant sought clarification of a specific order. The respondent had no objection. Tribunal disposed of the miscellaneous application and listed the main matter.
Clarification application disposed of; matter listed for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANAGEMENT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-FE-117/MUM/2018 (COD) MP-FE-15/MUM/2015 (Rest.) MP-FE-109/MUM/2018 ( MISC.) FPA-FE-125/MUM/2002
Sh. Goldie Sud
… Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Advocate appeared but appearance not given For the respondent : Shri Prashant Pandey, Legal Consultant
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
17.09.2018
MP-FE-109/MUM/2018 ( Misc.) & FPA-FE-125/MUM/2002
The present application has been filed for clarification of order
dated 13th November, 2017. The counsel for the respondent has no objection if the prayer is allowed.
Order is passed accordingly. MP is disposed of.
List this matter on 10th January, 2019 before Hon’ble Member
Smt. Ananya Ray in Court no. II.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
New Delhi, 17th September, 2018
‘s’
FPA-FE-125/MUM/2002
Page 1 of 1
Sh. Goldie Sud
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
