Disposed
FPA-71/MUM/2017 of Mrs. Rupa Tushar Gandhi v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
ATFPFPA-71/MUM/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Mrs. Rupa Tushar Gandhi V/s The Competent…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT Act AT NEW DELHI
FPA-12/BOM/2014
M/s. Royal Developers & Ors.
… Appellants
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : | Shri Ish Ja | in, Adv | ocate/ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shri Rajan | Yadav, | Advocate | ||
| For the respondent | : | Shri Stanly Inspecting |
Josep Officer |
h |
| MP-134/MUM/2017 (COD) | ||||
| MP-78/MUM/2015 (Stay) & |
||||
| FPA-21/MUM/2015 | ||||
| M/s. Oyster Shipmanagement | Pvt. | Ltd. Ors. | … | Appellants |
| FPA-44/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Jaya Anoopchand Shah | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-45/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Mr. Shailesh H. Negandhi | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-47/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Mr. Atul Anoopchand Shah | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-48/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Mrs. Niruben Jayant Shah | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-49/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Mrs. Asha Ramesh Doshi | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-50/MUM/2017 | ||||
| M/s. Shree Enterprises (Chem | icals | ) Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-51/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Mrs. Charu Ajay Shah | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-52/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Mr. Vijay Gulabrai Goradia | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-53/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Mrs. Neeta Vijay Doshi | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-44-45, 47-73, 75-78/MUM/2017 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| FPA-54/MUM/2017 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Hemendra Vijaychand Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-55/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Ajay Anoopchand Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-56/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Usha Hemendra Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-57/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s. Muscan Fero Silicon Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-58/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Laxmidas Gargovinddas Vjora Karta | … | Appellant |
| FPA-59/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Vijay Vinaychand Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-60/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s. Pruthvi Capital Market Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-61/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Bhupinder Singh | … | Appellant |
| FPA-62/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Dhiren Vasantraj Sheth | … | Appellant |
| FPA-63/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Komajit Ahuja | … | Appellant |
| FPA-64/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Satindrpal Singh Ahuja | … | Appellant |
| FPA-65/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Chetan Vora | … | Appellant |
| FPA-66/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Sheela Jaswant Khimani | … | Appellant |
| FPA-67/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Jaspal Kaur Ahuja | … | Appellant |
| FPA-68/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Mihir Tushar Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-69/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Kumud Keshavlal Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-70/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Arvinderpal Singh Ahuja | … | Appellant |
| FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-44-45, 47-73, 75-78/MUM/2017 |
Page 2 of 4 |
| FPA-71/MUM/2017 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mrs. Rupa Tushar Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-72/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Tushar Shantilal Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-73/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Prakash Champaklal Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-75/MUM/2017 | ||
| Hiral Tushar Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-76/MUM/2017 | ||
| Shipla Keten Mehta | … | Appellant |
| FPA-77/MUM/2017 | ||
| Rupa Singh | … | Appellant |
| & | ||
| FPA-78/MUM/2017 | ||
| Atul Shah (Deceased) | … | Appellant |
| Versus |
The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Shri Kiran Jain, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Stanly Joseph, Inspecting Officer CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER
03.07.2018
FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-44-45, 47-73, 7578/MUM/2017
The learned Counsel for the appellant, Shri Ish Jain for Appeal No. FPA-12/BOM/2014 and Shri Kiran Jain for Appeal No. FPA21/MUM/2015, FPA-44-45, 47-73, 75-78/MUM/2017 stated that another
FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-44-45, 47-73, 75-78/MUM/2017
Page 3 of 4
show-cause notice dated 10.2.2015 has been issued in the same case and has been allowed to be a part of the present appeal, by the earlier Bench.
The learned representative of the respondent states that the other show-cause notice has not been adjudicated probably on the ground that the show-cause notice was allowed as a part of the present appeal. Both the parties accordingly sought some time to enable the Competent Authority to adjudicate. Allowed. The matter may be listed after three months. The Competent Authority may consider deciding the other showcause notice in the meantime.
List on 23rd October, 2018.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 3rd July, 2018
‘r’
& FPA-44-45, 47-73, 75-78/MUM/2017
FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015
Page 4 of 4
M/s. Royal Developers & Ors.
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court