The Appellate Tribunal for Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators Act dismissed multiple appeals filed in Mumbai and Bombay as they were withdrawn by the appellants without any objection from the respondent.
All appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SMUGGLERS AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANIPULATORS ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-12/BOM/2014 M/s. Royal Developers & Ors. … Appellants Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants |
: Mr. |
Amitav | Bachchan, Advocate |
|---|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Mr. Ins |
Stanley pecting |
Joseph, Officer |
| 2. MP-134/MUM/2017 (COD) MP-78/MUM/2015 (Stay) & |
|||
FPA-21/MUM/2015 |
|||
| M/s. Oyster Shipmanagement Pvt. | Ltd. & Ors. | … |
Appellants |
| 3. FPA-44/MUM/2017 | |||
| Jaya Anoopchand Shah | … | Appellant | |
| 4. FPA-45/MUM/2017 | |||
| Mr. Shailesh H. Negandhi | … | Appellant | |
| 5. FPA-47/MUM/2017 | |||
| Mr. Atul Anoopchand Shah | … | Appellant | |
| 6. FPA-48/MUM/2017 | |||
| Mrs. Niruben Jayant Shah | … | Appellant | |
| 7. FPA-49/MUM/2017 | |||
| Mrs. Asha Ramesh Doshi | … | Appellant | |
| 8. FPA-50/MUM/2017 | |||
| M/s. Shree Enterprises (Chemical | s) Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| 9. FPA-51/MUM/2017 | |||
| Mrs. Charu Ajay Shah | … | Appellant | |
| 10. FPA-52/MUM/2017 | |||
| Mr. Vijay Gulabrai Goradia | … | Appellant | |
| FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015, FPA-44-45/MUM/2017, FPA-47-73/MUM/2017 & FPA-75-78/MUM/2017 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| 11. FPA-53/MUM/2017 Mrs. Neeta Vijay Doshi |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| 12. FPA-54/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Hemendra Vinaychand Doshi | … | Appellant |
| 13. FPA-55/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Ajay Anoopchand Shah | … | Appellant |
| 14. FPA-56/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Usha Hemendra Doshi | … | Appellant |
| 15. FPA-57/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s. Muskan Fero Silicon Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| 16. FPA-58/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Laxmidas Hargovindas Vora | … | Appellant |
| 17. FPA-59/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Vijay Vinaychand Doshi | … | Appellant |
| 18. FPA-60/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s. Pruthvi Capital Market Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| 19. FPA-61/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Bhupinder Singh | … | Appellant |
| 20. FPA-62/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Dhiren Vasantrai Sheth | … | Appellant |
| 21. FPA-63/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Komaljit Ahuja | … | Appellant |
| 22. FPA-64/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Satinderpal Singh Ahuja | … | Appellant |
| 23. FPA-65/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Chetan Vora | … | Appellant |
| 24. FPA-66/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Sheela Jaswant Khimani | … | Appellant |
| 25. FPA-67/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Jaspal Kaur Ahuja | … | Appellant |
| 26. FPA-68/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Mihir Tushar Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| 27. FPA-69/MUM/2017 | ||
Mrs. Kumud Keshavlal Shah |
… | Appellant |
| 28. FPA-70/MUM/2017 | ||
Mr. Arvinderpal Singh Ahuja |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015, FPA-44-45/MUM/2017, FPA-47-73/MUM/2017 & FPA-75-78/MUM/2017 |
Page 2 of 4 |
| 29. FPA-71/MUM/2017 Mrs. Roopa Tushar Gandhi |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| 30. FPA-72/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Tushar Shantilal Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| 31. FPA-73/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Prakash Champaklal Shah | … | Appellant |
| 32. FPA-75/MUM/2017 | ||
| Hiral Tushar Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| 33. FPA-76/MUM/2017 | ||
| Shipla Keten Mehta | … | Appellant |
| 34. FPA-77/MUM/2017 | ||
| Rupa Singh | … | Appellant |
| & | ||
| 35. FPA-78/MUM/2017 | ||
| Atul Shah (Deceased) | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants |
: Mr. Sadre Alam & Tusharika, Advocates |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Mr. Stanley Joseph, Inspecting Officer |
| CORAM | |
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : MEMBER |
| ORDER 14.12.2018 |
Learned counsels for the appellants states that they are
withdrawing all the appeals which may be allowed. Representative of the
respondent has no objection.
FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015, FPA-44-45/MUM/2017, FPA-47-73/MUM/2017 & FPA-75-78/MUM/2017
Page 3 of 4
The appeals are therefore dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 14th December, 2018 ‘AS’
FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015, FPA-44-45/MUM/2017, FPA-47-73/MUM/2017 & FPA-75-78/MUM/2017
Page 4 of 4
M/s. Royal Developers & Ors.
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Ananya Ray
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
