The appellate tribunal granted an adjournment for hearing the consolidated appeals to 03rd July, 2018, allowing one final opportunity to the parties due to counsel availability and voluminous files.
List on 03rd July, 2018 at 11:00 AM.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT Act AT NEW DELHI
FPA-12/BOM/2014
M/s. Royal Developers & Ors.
… Appellants
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : | Ms. Nita Sol | anki, | Proxy Counsel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Stanley Officer |
Jose | ph, Inspecting |
| MP-134/MUM/2017 (COD) MP-78/MUM/2015 (Stay) & |
||||
| FPA-21/MUM/2015 | ||||
| M/s. Oyster Shipmenagement | Pvt. | Ltd. Ors. |
… | Appellants |
| FPA-44/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Jaya Anoopchand Shah | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-45/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Mr. Shailesh H. Negandhi | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-47/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Mr. Atul Anoopchand Shah | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-48/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Mrs. Niruben Jayant Shah | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-49/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Mrs. Asha Ramesh Doshi | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-50/MUM/2017 | ||||
| M/s. Shree Enterprises (Chem | icals | ) Pvt. Ltd. |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-51/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Mrs. Charu Ajay Shah | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-52/MUM/2017 | ||||
| Mr. Vijay Gulabrai Goradia | … | Appellant | ||
| FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-44-45, 47-73, 75-78/MUM/2017 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| FPA-53/MUM/2017 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mrs. Neeta Vijay Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-54/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Hemendra Vijaychand Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-55/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Ajay Anoopchand Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-56/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Usha Hemendra Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-57/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s. Muscan Fero Silicon Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-58/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Laxmidas Gargovinddas Vjora Karta | … | Appellant |
| FPA-59/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Vijay Vinaychand Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-60/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s. Pruthvi Capital Market Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-61/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Bhupinder Singh | … | Appellant |
| FPA-62/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Dhiren Vasantraj Sheth | … | Appellant |
| FPA-63/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Komajit Ahuja | … | Appellant |
| FPA-64/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Satindrpal Singh Ahuja | … | Appellant |
| FPA-65/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Chetan Vora | … | Appellant |
| FPA-66/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Sheela Jaswant Khimani | … | Appellant |
| FPA-67/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Jaspal Kaur Ahuja | … | Appellant |
| FPA-68/MUM/2017 | ||
Mr. Mihir Tushar Gandhi |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-69/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Kumud Keshavlal Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-44-45, 47-73, 75-78/MUM/2017 |
Page 2 of 4 |
| FPA-70/MUM/2017 Mr. Arvinderpal Singh Ahuja |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| FPA-71/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Rupa Tushar Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-72/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Tushar Shantilal Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-73/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Prakash Champaklal Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-75/MUM/2017 | ||
| Hiral Tushar Gandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-76/MUM/2017 | ||
| Shipla Keten Mehta | … | Appellant |
| FPA-77/MUM/2017 | ||
| Rupa Singh | … | Appellant |
| & | ||
| FPA-78/MUM/2017 | ||
| Atul Shah (Deceased) | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Competent Authority, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Shri Kiran Jain, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Stanley Joseph, Inspecting Officer CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER ORDER 01.05.2018
FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-44-45, 47-73, 7578/MUM/2017
Ms. Nita Solanki, Proxy counsel for the appellant in FPA12/BOM/2014 seeks an adjournment as the arguing counsel is not
& FPA-44-45, 47-73, 75-78/MUM/2017
FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015
Page 3 of 4
available. The learned counsel for the appellant in FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-44-45, 47-73, 75-78/MUM/2017 states that all the matters may be heard together since issues are the same and hence they may be listed together. The learned representative of the respondent states that he has to carry voluminous files and hence it is inconvenient for him and hence opposes the adjournment request.
In the interest of justice, I am inclined to give one final opportunity.
List on 03rd July, 2018 at 11:00 AM.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 01st May, 2018
‘A’
& FPA-44-45, 47-73, 75-78/MUM/2017
FPA-12/BOM/2014, FPA-21/MUM/2015
Page 4 of 4
M/s. Royal Developers & Ors.
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Ananya Ray
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
