FPA-44/MUM/2017 of Jaya Anoopchand shah v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
ATFPFPA-44/MUM/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Jaya Anoopchand shah V/s The Competent…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
¶2
| FPA-44/MUM/2017 Jaya Anoopchand shah |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| FPA-45/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr Shailesh H. Negandhi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-47/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Atul Anoopchand shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-48/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Niruben Jayant shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-49/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Asha Ramesh Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-50/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s Shree Enterprises (chemicals) Pvt. Ltd. |
… | Appellant |
| FPA-51/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Charu Ajay Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-52/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Vijay Gulabrai Goradia | … | Appellant |
| FPA-53/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Neeta Vijay Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-54/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Hemendra Vijaychand Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-55/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Ajay Anoopchand Shah | … | Appellant |
| FPA-56/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mrs. Usha Hemendra Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-57/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s Muscan Fero Silicon Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-58/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Laxmidas Gargovinddas | ||
| Vjora karta Ofr L.h. Vora HUF | … | Appellant |
| FPA-59/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Vijay Vinaychand Doshi | … | Appellant |
| FPA-60/MUM/2017 | ||
| M/s Pruthvi Capital Market Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| FPA-61/MUM/2017 | ||
| Mr. Bhupinder Singh | … | Appellant |
| FPA-44, 45-73/MUM/2017, FPA-75-78/MUM/2017 FPA-21/MUM/2015 & FPA-12/MUM/2014 |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Jaya Anoopchand Shah
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
AI extract
Ananya Ray
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court