This order records the procedural direction by the Prevention of Money Laundering Act Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, allowing parties to file written synopses and listing the matter for hearing. No substantive decision was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-929/HYD/2015
K.L. Narayana … Appellant Versus
The Joint Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Harshavardhan Raddy, Advocate For the respondent no. 1 : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate For the respondent no. 2 : Shri Abhinav Agnihotri, Advocate For the respondent no. 3 : Shri Vikram Sobti, Advocate Mr. Mehul Parti, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 22.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-929/HYD/2015
Pleadings are complete. Both the parties are allowed to file the
written synopsis on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 11th July, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
22nd March, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-929/HYD/2015
Page 1 of 1
K.L. Narayana
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
