The appellate tribunal adjourned the appeal to enable the appellant's counsel to review the complete file. The respondent raised no objection. The matter was subsequently listed for further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-929/HYD/2015
K.L. Narayana … Appellant/ Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. K. Harshavardhan, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
16.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-929/HYD/2015
Shri K. Harshavardhan, Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that his client has engaged him very recently and he wishes to go through the complete set of papers. Therefore, the matter may be adjourned for some other date. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection.
List on 22nd March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 16th November, 2016 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-929/HYD/2015
Page 1 of 1
K.L. Narayana
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
MANMOHAN SINGH
KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
