A vacation application was filed by the respondent in a money laundering matter. The court noted lack of reply from the appellant and uncertainty regarding compliance. An opportunity to comply with costs was granted to the appellant before the next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2926/PTN/2016 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1565/PTN/2015 (Stay) MP-PMLA-1488/PTN/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-801/PTN/2015
Krishna Kumar @ Krishna Rai … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Abhay Pandey, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 17.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-801/PTN/2015, MP-PMLA-2926/PTN/2016 (Misc.), MPPMLA-1565/PTN/2015 (Stay) & MP-PMLA-1488/PTN/2015 (Stay)
Reply to the vacation application filed by the respondent has not been filed by the appellant. Shri Vikas Garg, the learned counsel for the respondent insist that the interim order granted on 27th March, 2015 should be vacated. The learned counsel for the appellant is not able to specifically inform us whether the order is complied or not. He seeks some times to verify the position.
FPA-PMLA-801/PTN/2015
Page 1 of 2
One last opportunity is granted subject to the cost of Rs. 5,000/which shall be paid by the counsel for the appellant to the counsel for the respondent before the next date of hearing.
List on 24th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra)
Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 17th February, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-801/PTN/2015
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim order granted on 27th March, 2015 should be vacated in the absence of a reply from the appellant.
Whether a false statement was made regarding compliance with the interim order.
Krishna Kumar @ Krishna Rai
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
