In response to the appellant's request to withdraw vakalanama, the appealed dismissed as no one appeared for the appellant on the final hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1376/CHD/2015 (STAY) &
FPA-PMLA-776/CHD/2014
Saroj Minocha … Appellant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER
21.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-776/CHD/2014
On the last date of hearing the learned counsel for the appellant pointed out to withdraw his Vakalatanama. He was asked to complete provisions for withdrawing the Vakalatanama by issuing the notice and then file an application as per law.
The appeal is listed for final hearing. No one appears for the appellant or his counsel so we have no option but to dismiss the appeal.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 21st April, 2017
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-776/CHD/2014
Page 1 of 1
Saroj Minocha
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
