A one-paragraph order allowing both parties to file written submissions before the next hearing on an matter pending before the Appellate Tribunal (PMLA). No substantive decision was rendered.
Allowed to file written submissions; matter listed for next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-695/BNG/2014 S. Revanna … Appellant/ Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : | Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: | Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : | MEMBER |
ORDER
12.01.2017
FPA-PMLA-695/BNG/2014
Shri Rajeev Awasthi, learned counsel for the appellant seeks an adjournment which is not opposed by Shri Vikas Garg, learned counsel for the respondent.
List on 20th April, 2017.
In the meanwhile both the parties are allowed to file the written submissions on or before the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
12th January, 2017
‘d’ FPA-PMLA-695/BNG/2014
Page 1 of 1
S. Revanna
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
