Interim order granting adjournment sought by proxy counsel for the appellant in the specified PMLA appeals; matter listed for future hearing without substantive decision.
Adjournment granted; interim order continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1259/LKW/2014 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-693/LKW/2014
K. K. Jain Educational Trust … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Abhishek Dhingra, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 24.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-693/LKW/2014
Shri Vikas Pahwa, learned senior counsel on behalf of the
appellant is not available and Shri Abhishek Dhingra, proxy counsel appears on behalf of the appellant. An adjournment is sought which is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent.
List on 20th September, 2017.
Interim order to continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 24th July, 2017 ‘d’ FPA-PMLA-693/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
K. K. Jain Educational Trust
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
