The Appellate Tribunal granted one more opportunity to both parties to file written synopses before the next hearing regarding a reference order.
This order merely grants a further opportunity to parties to file written synopses and lists the case for the next hearing. No substantive legal issue was decided in this short order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1385/MUM/2015 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-675/MUM/2014
Sudhakar Vithal Narvekar
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Mr. Ujwal R. Agandsurve, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 02.05.2017
FPA-PMLA-675/MUM/2014
The learned counsel for the appellant has made his submissions. An adjournment is sought on behalf of the respondent to file the written synopsis. He also submits that he will make his submissions on the next date of hearing.
One more opportunity is granted to both the parties to file the written synopsis on or before the next date of hearing.
List on 11th May, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 2nd May, 2017
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-675/MUM/2014
Page 1 of 1
Sudhakar Vithal Narvekar
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
