Adjournment of an appeal against fixed occupation charges in a PMLA matter requested by counsel, with the appeal listed for a later date.
Adjournment allowed; appeal listed for next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-673/DLI/2014 Nimmagadda Prasad … Appellant/Applicant Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Manish Jha, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 19.01.2017
FPA-PMLA-673/DLI/2014
The learned counsel for the appellant states that the occupation charges fixed by this Tribunal have been deposited. He has got the receipt yesterday only and shall submit the same in the registry during the course of the day. Copy has also been handed over to the learned counsel for the respondent. As far as hearing of appeal is concerned, he seeks an adjournment as the arguing counsel is busy in some other matters.
List this appeal also on 15th May, 2017. Interim order to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 19th Januray, 2017
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-673/DLI/2014
Page 1 of 1
Nimmagadda Prasad
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
22 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
