A 3-judge division of the Appellate Tribunal under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act accepted that re-notification of a non-disposal order is necessary but provided no further reasoning or operative directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-630/MUM/2014
Meenaxi Mansotra … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER ORDER 20.03.2017
FPA-PMLA-630/MUM/2014
Re-notified on 5th July, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member New Delhi, 20th March, 2017. ‘d’ FPA-PMLA-630/MUM/2014
Page 1 of 1
Meenaxi Mansotra
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
