The Preventive Member of the Appellate Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply within four weeks after the failure of previous attempts, while listing the matter for further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-615/AHD/2014
M/s Neptune Overseas Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad … Respondent
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Vikramjeet Bannerjee, Sr. Advocate Shri Chaitanya Safaya, Advocate Shri Raghav Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate and Shri Mohd. Faraz, Advocate on behalf of Shri S. A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 29.05.2017
FPA-PMLA-615/AHD/2014
In terms of the order dated 27th February, 2017 one final opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the appellant who may file the rejoinder by the next date.
List this matter on 26th September, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 29th May, 2017 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-615/AHD/2014
Page 1 of 1
M/s Neptune Overseas Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
MANMOHAN SINGH
KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
26 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
