Appeal against confiscation order in PMLA case. Court grants final opportunity to respondent to file reply, lists matter for further hearing on 12th April 2017. No substantive decision rendered in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2897/DLI/2016 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-605/DLI/2014
Ms. Nidhi Uppal … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Mr. Vineet Gupta, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Saytam, Adv. For Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 16.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-605/DLI/2014 & MP-PMLA-2897/DLI/2016 (Misc.)
Reply has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to file the
reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant, who will file the rejoinder within three weeks thereafter.
List the appeal as well application on 12th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 16th February, 2017
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-605/DLI/2014
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nidhi Uppal
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
22 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
