An interim order in a PMLA appeal proceeding. The tribunal directed the respondent to file a written synopsis within four weeks, with the list set for 27 October 2017. No submission was made on the appellant's request for documents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2897/DLI/2016 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-605/DLI/2014
Ms. Nidhi Uppal … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Gorang Gupta, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 04.08.2017
MP-PMLA-2897/DLI/2016 (Misc.) & FPA-PMLA-605/DLI/2014
The learned counsel for the respondent is not inclined to supply
the documents referred in the application. He submits that this application may be considered alongwith the appeal. Let written synopsis be filed by the respondent as last opportunity within four weeks.
List on 27th October, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 4th August, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-605/DLI/2014
Page 1 of 1
Ms. Nidhi Uppal
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
22 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
