In an adjourned stay proceeding, the PMLA Tribunal listed the matter for conclusion of respondent's arguments but adjourned to 7th February 2017 as the appellant's counsel was unavailable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-935/CHN/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-563/CHN/2014
M/s Mangal Royal Jawels (P) Ltd. … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Bakul Jain, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate Shri Manish Jain, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 06.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-563/CHN/2014
In the above said matter, the arguments have to be concluded on behalf of the respondent. Counsel for the appellant is not available due to personal difficulty.
List for arguments on 7th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 6th February, 2017
‘s’ FPA-PMLA-563/CHN/2014
Page 1 of 1
M/s Mangal Royal Jawels (P) Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
