A listing order in an unopposed appeal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act where the respondent sought an adjournment to file written submissions by the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-935/CHN/2014 (Stay)
FPA-PMLA-563/CHN/2014
M/s Mangal Royal Jawels (P) Ltd.
… Appellant
Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri P.D. Jain, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate Shri Manish Jain, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
17.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-563/CHN/2014
The learned counsel for the appellant has addressed the arguments on behalf of the appellant. The counsel for the respondent seeks some time to argue the matter as he submits that he has been recently engaged in the matter.
List on 30th November, 2016 for remaining arguments on behalf of the respondent. In the meanwhile, both sides will also file short written submission on or before the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 17th November, 2016 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-563/CHN/2014
Page 1 of 1
M/s Mangal Royal Jawels (P) Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
