Order granting the appellant one final opportunity to argue the appeal due to unavailability of counsel; listed for future hearing.
One final opportunity to argue the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-502/AHD/2013
H.M. Joshi
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Sandeep Pathak, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate on behalf of Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
18.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-502/AHD/2013
The cost has been paid. The arguing counsel is not available. One
final opportunity is granted to the appellant to argue the appeal.
List on 30th May, 2017 at 2.30 p.m.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
18th April, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-502/AHD/2013
Page 1 of 1
H.M. Joshi
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
