The Appellate Tribunal heard stay and FPA applications. No one appeared for the appellant in the FPA matter. The respondent counsel sought adjournment. Listing fixed for February 27, 2017. The order text ends without further disposition details.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-423/HYD/2013 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-466/HYD/2013
Madala Ramesh
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MAN MOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
31.01.2017
FPA-PMLA-466/HYD/2013
No one appeared on behalf of the appellant. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that he has received the communication from the appellant’s counsel seeking an adjournment. A copy of the said request has been received by the Registrar of this Tribunal as well.
List on 27th February, 2017.
(Justice Man Mohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 31st January, 2017 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-466/HYD/2013
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant adjournment in FPA-PMLA-466/HYD/2013
Madala Ramesh
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
MAN MOHAN SINGH
KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA
ANAND KISHORE
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
