The Appellate Tribunal listed a money laundering appeal. The appellant submitted that he was acquitted by a magistrates' court. The respondent's counsel sought time to take instructions. The matter was listed for 31 January 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-423/HYD/2013 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-466/HYD/2013
Madala Ramesh
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri K.S Rama Rao, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 01.12.2016
FPA-PMLA-466/HYD/2013
The Learned Counsel for the appellant states that the appellant has been acquitted vide judgement dated 9th May, 2016 passed by the 12th Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. The copy of the judgment is handed over to the learned counsel for the respondent who seeks some time to take the instructions from his client.
List on 31st January, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 1st December, 2016. ‘D’
FPA-PMLA-466/HYD/2013
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellate court should consider the acquittal of the appellant in the underlying proceeding.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Madala Ramesh
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
