Listing order in an appeal seeking stay under PMLA. The bench deferred consideration of objections regarding a non-necessary party.
This order is a procedural listing hearing in an appeal for a stay under the PMLA. No substantive adjudication or legal principle is articulated. The matter was listed for a future date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3685/BNG/217 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1874/BNG/2017
M/s Ghatge Motors Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Shubhangi T. Advocate and Shri P.V.S. Saravana Raja, Advocate
For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 27.10.2017
FPA-PMLA-1874/BNG/2017
The counsel for the respondent states that the reply could not be filed as the copy of appeal has not been supplied. Let the same be supplied by the appellant within one week. On receipt of the same, reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the appellant who may file the rejoinder thereafter.
The counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 9 submits that the respondent no. 9 is not a necessary party, respondent no. 9 is an independent and has also filed a separate appearance/appeal being Appeal No. FPA-PMLA-1878/BNG/2017. This aspect of the objection raised by respondent no. 9 will be also be considered on the next date of hearing.
List on 26th April, 2018
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 27th October, 2017 M
FPA-PMLA-1874/BNG/2017
Page 1 of 1
M/s Ghatge Motors Pvt. Ltd.
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
