The tribunal issued notices in an appeal under Section 26 of the PMLA and a stay application, allowing the respondent four weeks to file a reply before listing the matter.
Notices issued in appeal under Section 26 PMLA and stay application; respondent granted time to file reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3628/DLI/2017 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-1852/DLI/2017
Mohit Garg … Appellant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate On behalf of Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 15.09.2017
FPA-PMLA-1852/DLI/2017
The appellant has filed the appeal under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 31st May, 2017. As agreed at present notice is issued in the appeal as well as in the Stay application. Mr. Atrul Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent accepts the notice, he seeks time to file the reply. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 02nd February, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 15th September, 2017 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1852/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Mohit Garg
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
MANMOHAN SINGH
MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
24 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
