Appeal filed under Section 26 of the PMLA. Applicant sought four weeks time to file reply to a notice, with leave to file rejoinder later. Court listed the matter and adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3538/DDN/2017 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-1807/DDN/2017
Shri Satish Kumar Sharma … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Harikesh Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri S. K. Sharma, Advocate Shri Het Ram, E.O. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
20.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1807/DDN/2017
Fresh appeal has been filed by the appellant under section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Issue Notice. Learned Counsel for the respondent accepts the notice and seeks four weeks time to file the reply with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 12th October, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 20th July, 2017 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1807/DDN/2017
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satish Kumar Sharma
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
