The appellate tribunal disposed of an unpressed application. In a separate application listing order, the respondent was directed to recover unpaid costs from the appellant before the next date.
Appellant directed to pay cost on or before the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3752/LKW/2017 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-1875/LKW/2015 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-339/LKW/2011 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-178/LKW /2011
Vikas Kumar Sinha … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Anshuman Sinha, Advocate Shri Imran Alam, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 28.08.2017
MP-PMLA-3752/LKW/2017 (E.H.)
The learned counsel of the appellant is not pressing this application. The same is disposed of. The earlier application for stay i.e. MP-PMLA-339/LKW/2011 is also become infructuous as possession of the property has already been taken.
FPA-PMLA-178/LKW /2011
Shri Nitesh Rana, learned counsel for the respondent submits that cost has not been paid. The appellant is directed to pay the cost on or before the next date.
List on 13th November, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
New Delhi, 28th August, 2017. ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-178/LKW/2011
Page 1 of 1
Vikas Kumar Sinha
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
