The Appellate Tribunal granted the appellant one final opportunity to argue the matter before listing it on 16 August, 2017, as there was no objection from the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1874/LKW/2015 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-222/LKW/2011 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-175/LKW /2011
Sunil Kumar Sinha … Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Vinay Prakash, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 04.05.2017
FPA-PMLA-175/LKW /2011
One final opportunity is granted to the appellant to argue the matter, since there is no objection on behalf of the respondent. In the interest of justice, list on 16th August, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 4th May, 2017 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-175/LKW/2011
Page 1 of 1
Sunil Kumar Sinha
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
