The Tribunal listed the appeal for next hearing after granting time to present submissions. It noted the cost was unpaid and gave the appellant a final opportunity to pay before the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1874/LKW/2015 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-222/LKW/2011 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-175/LKW /2011
Sunil Kumar Sinha … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Vijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER
17.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-175/LKW /2011
In earlier connected matter the judgment has been passed in appeal no. FPA-PMLA-176/LKW/2011 & FPA-PMLA-181/LKW/2011. The learned counsel for both the parties seeks time to go through the judgment passed by this Tribunal and to make their submission on the next date.
The cost has not been paid by the appellant. The last opportunity is granted to the appellant to pay the cost before the next date of hearing.
List this appeal on 4th May, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal)
Member
New Delhi, 17th February, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-175/LKW/2011
Page 1 of 1
Sunil Kumar Sinha
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
