An interlocutory order allowing additional time for the respondent to file a reply brief in the PMLA appeal, with the matter listed for subsequent hearing.
The Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for adjournment, granting the respondent two weeks to file a reply brief with an advance copy to the appellant for a rejoinder, before hearing on April 10, 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3317/CHN/2017 (STAY) FPA-PMLA-1713/CHN/2017
Thiru S.K. Kaqrthikeyan
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri M.P. Parthiban, Advocate Shri S. Parthasarathi, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : MEMBER |
ORDER 06.11.2017
MP-PMLA-3317/CHN/2017 (STAY) & FPA-PMLA-1713/CHN/2017
Some more time is sought on behalf of the respondent for filing the
reply. Let the same be filed within two weeks with an advance copy to the learned Counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder thereafter.
List on 10th April, 2018.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi,
06th November, 2017
‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1713/CHN/2017 Page 1 of 1
Thiru S.K. Kaqrthikeyan
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
