Listing order in FPA-PMLA appeal. Court allowed the respondents to file a reply and fixed a date for adjournment listing.
Permitted the respondent to file a reply and listed the matter for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1704/DLI/2017
Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. …
Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Mukesh Sharma, Advocate Shri Mudit Jain, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 21.07.2017
FPA-PMLA-1704/DLI/2017
Reply to the appeal has been filed by the respondent. Rejoinder, if
any, be filed within four weeks. Since the connected matters are coming up on 21.12.2017, this matter may also be listed on 21.12.2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 21st July, 2017
‘r’
FPA-PMLA-1704/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
