FPA-PMLA-1697/DLI/2017 of Shamken Multifab Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Shamken Multifab ltd. V/s The Deputy…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3573/DLI/2017 (U.A.) MP-PMLA-3574/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3401/DLI/2017 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1697/DLI/2017
Shamken Multifab ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Mukesh Sharma, Advocate Shri Mudit Jain, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 06.07.2017
MP-PMLA-3573/DLI/2017 (U.A.), MP-PMLA-3574/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3401/DLI/2017 (Exemption), FPA-PMLA-1697/DLI/2017
Fresh applications have been filed by the appellant. Issue notice to the respondent for 21st July 2017. Reply, if any, be filed by the next date. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that in the meanwhile the appellant will take necessary steps as per the procedure later on under Rule 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering (Taking Possession of Attached or Frozen Properties Confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2013 in relation to the immovable property with the Enforcement Directorate within five days.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shamken Multifab ltd.
- respondent
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · July
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1697/DLI/2017
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court