The Appellate Tribunal stayed proceedings on the fresh appeal filed under section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, by issuing a notice to the respondent for filing a reply within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3401/DLI/2017 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1697/DLI/2017 Shamken Multifab Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Mudit Jain, Advocate Shri Mukesh Sharma, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER
28.04.2017
FPA-PMLA-1697/DLI/2017
The fresh appeal has been filed under section 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the impugned order dated 03.02.2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority. Issue notice to the respondent. Shri S.K. Sharma, counsel for the respondent accepts the notice. Reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List this appeal on 21st July, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 28th April, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1697/DLI/2017 Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue notice to respondent for reply to fresh appeal filed under section 26 PMLA regarding exemption application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shamken Multifab Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
