Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1684/DLI/2017 of Eshan Chaturvedi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

ATFP2 Mar 2017FPA-PMLA-1684/DLI/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order notes that a fresh appeal under Section 26 of the PMLA, 2002 was filed against an attachment order. The court listed the application for determination on the next date and ordered the respondent not to take further steps in relation to the impugned properties in the interim.

What did the court decide?

Interim stay on further steps by the respondent regarding the attached properties pending hearing; copy of order to be given 'dasti' to parties.

FPA-PMLA-1684/DLI/2017 of Eshan Chaturvedi v/s The Joint Director… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-3241/DLI/2017 (U.A) MP-PMLA-3240/DLI/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3239/DLI/2017 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-1684/DLI/2017 Eshan Chaturvedi

¶3

… Appellant

¶4

Versus

¶5

The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent

¶6

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶7

For the appellant	: Shri Vijay Aggarwal, Advocate Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Shaijan C. George, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: MEMBER
SHRI B.K. BANSAL	: MEMBER

¶8

ORDER 02.03.2017

¶9

FPA-PMLA-1684/DLI/2017

¶10

The fresh appeal has been filed by the counsel for the appellant under Section 26 of PMLA Act, 2002 against the impugned order dated 3^rd February, 2017 passed in O.A. No. 642/2016. Along with the appeals, the interim application has also been filed. The similar matter is coming upon 10^th March, 2017. Notice to the appeal be issued for 10^th March, 2017. The counsel for the appellant is pressing for interim order at this stage pertaining to property No. 98-Eastern Avenue, Sainik Farms, New Delhi-110062 and 97D-Eastern Avenue, Sainik Farms, New Delhi110062 only. Without prejudice he has also offered to deposit the sum of Rs. 50,000/- towards the rent of both the properties from the date of passing of the attachment order. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the said order may be passed at this stage as the

¶11

FPA-PMLA-1684/DLI/2017

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

respondent intents to verify the position and inform this Tribunal so that the appropriate order for market rent may be passed.

¶14

List the interim application for consideration on next date i.e. 10^th March, 2017.

¶15

In the meanwhile the counsel for the respondent shall not take the

¶16

further steps in relation to the said property.

¶17

Copy of the order be given “ dasti ” to both the parties.

¶18

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶19

(G.C. Mishra) Member

(B.K. Bansal)

Member

New Delhi,

2^nd March, 2017

„K‟

FPA-PMLA-1684/DLI/2017

¶26

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1684/DLI/2017 of Eshan Chaturvedi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1684/DLI/2017 of Eshan Chaturvedi v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases